So they tell me that because I am white and a male that I am a racinist.  How come white women get a pass on that one?  Oh, wait.  Since the Dems already don’t have the white male vote but do have the white female vote that may be a possible reason.  Wise up people.

So they have no knowledge of me and my history (NSA aside for now) and they are allowed to call me names.  They are allowed to place a wrapper around me and then tell the world what it is that I am.  There I am, on display.  Grumpy old white man who hates everything and everyone that the Dems claim to love.  That’s some mighty fine convenience.  Nah, it ain’t despicable; it’s just normal.

If I do not agree or even do not particularly like a man, in this case the leader of this country, I am labeled as being a racinist.  Even if this man is half-white I am still accused of hating him because, why, because he is half-black.  How do they know which half I do not like or agree with or even if, just maybe if, I do not like and do not agree with the whole of him.  It couldn’t be the man but it sure as heck can be the man’s apparent color.  Its 50-50 so why does the coin flip always come up heads when I call tails?  Just ain’t right, I wish there was something that I could do to…

Hey wait, I have it!

If I toss Joe Biden into the mix and say that I don’t like and don’t agree with “them” does that now make it 75% anti-white and 25% anti-black?  No?  Still not enough?

How about throwing in Harry Reid for free?  Now it’s 83-1/3% anti-cracker and 16-2/3% anti-well, black.  Did I get the math right?

Let’s not stop.  Let’s add in Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer (did I spell that right Chuck?), Dick Durbin, Steny Hoyer, Debbie What’s-Her-Name Schultz (that was tougher), Waxman, Clinton (pick)…  That’s enough for now.  Let me tally it up.

That’s 10 Dems.  Nine are white (unless one of those honkeys is lying about something in their past and I’m assuming that they would have leveraged that by now) and one is half-white.  So that makes me what now: 95% anti-white and 5% anti-black correct?

So, see?  No racinism here.  I’ll let you figure out what these ten DEMOCRATS have in common but I won’t give you a clue or talk about their IDEOLOGY or their POLICIES or their PARTY PLATFORM or their PAST PERFORMANCE or their HATE-BAITING TACTICS or even their ANTI-WHITE RHETORIC (and I am white so that should offend me but, really, it doesn’t anymore).

Maybe you’ll conclude that it’s still racinism.  Sigh.

Oh yeah, you might notice that I did include two and possibly three women but if I need to add more to likewise prove there is no sexinism or anti-femalarity at work here either I will be glad to do so.

But you probably wouldn’t be swayed by that either.